Jesus Christ = Eesa Krishnan


Sage of Kanchi

Periyava Abaya Hastham

Jaya Jaya Shankara Hara Hara Shankara – A chapter that dazzles Sri Periyava’s Sarvaganathvam; a chapter that accentuates Advaitha; a chapter that underlies Sanatana Dharma as the root for all the religions. Eesa Krishna!! Ram Ram.

Source – Vol 7, Thookakaranum, Attakaaranum, Paatukaarargalum, Christhuvum Siva Vishunugalum.

  • உரை நிகழ்ந்தது 1966-ல் வைகுண்ட ஏகாதசியான டிஸம்பர் 23-க்கும் திருவாதிரையான அம்மாத 27/28க்கும் இடையிலுள்ள 25-ந்தேதி என்று வாசகருக்கு மீண்டும் நினைவூட்டுகிறோம்.

அந்த இரண்டுக்கும் நடுவிலே இன்றைக்கு கிறிஸ்துமஸ்*. அது லோகம் பூராவிலும் ரொம்பப் பேர் மதாநுஷ்டான தினமாகவோ, அல்லது ‘ஹாலிடே’ உல்லாஸமாகவோ – ‘ஹோலிடே’யாகவோ, வெறும் ‘ஹாலிடே’யாகவோ – கொண்டாடும் நாளாக இருக்கிறது. இதன் காரண புருஷரையும் நம்மைச் சேர்ந்தவராக, அதிலும் தம்முடைய பேராலேயே நான் சொன்ன அந்த சிவ-விஷ்ணு அபேதத்தைக் காட்டுகிறவராக, சொல்லிக் கொள்ளலாமோ என்று தோன்றுகிறது!

அவர் பெயர் என்ன? ஜீஸஸ் க்ரைஸ்ட்’ என்கிறோம். அது ஜெர்மானிக் என்றும் Teutonic என்றும் சொல்கிற பாஷா ‘க்ரூப்’பைச் சேர்ந்த ஜெர்மன் பாஷை, இங்கிலீஷ், டட்ச், இன்னும் ஸ்காண்டினேவியன் பாஷைகள் என்பதாக நார்வே, ஸ்வீடன், டென்மார்க் முதலான தேசங்களில் பேசப்படும் பாஷைகள் ஆகியவற்றில் அவருக்கு ஏற்பட்டிருக்கிற பெயர்தான். அவருக்கு மூலத்தில் ஹீப்ருக்களின் பாஷையில் என்ன பெயரோ அதுவே – ஸம்ஸ்க்ருத ‘ச்ராவணீ’ தமிழ் ‘ஆவணி’யாக உருமாறின…

View original post 581 more words



Categories: Devotee Experiences

2 replies

  1. Did Jesus really Exist ? See Capt Ajit Vadkayil Blog . Appolonius transformed into Jesus. According to Kota Venkatachalam in his book Abhasa Kristava argus that krishna cult becomes Christ cult

  2. Many Jaya Jaya Sankara to Shri ST Ravikumar for the translation. Rama Rama

    Christ, Siva & Vishnu

    In between these two, Christmas is celebrated today *. It is being celebrated by the people, world over, as a very religious day or a ‘holiday’ with merriment – as either a ‘holy day’ or merely, a ‘holiday’. It looks like that we can call the person who is the reason for this, as one of our own, especially as a person who is highlighting, by his very name, the lack of difference between Siva and Vishnu.

    ** The reader is once again reminded that this speech happened in the year 1966 on 25 December, in between Vaikunta Ekadasi which occurred on December 23 and Thiruvadirai of that month on 27/28th.
    What was his name? We call him as ‘Jesus Christ’. It is a name given to him in German language, which is called Germanic and Teutonic and belonging to the language group, English, Dutch and the so called Scandinavian languages spoken in Norway, Sweden and Denmark. His name, which was originally in Hebrew language, has, like the Sanskrit word ‘Sravani’ transforming to ‘Aavani’ in tamil, has become ‘Jesus’ in these languages.

    He does not belong to Europe, where these languages are prevalent. He belongs to our Asian continent. His mother tongue is Armian. It belongs to the Semitic group of languages, spoken by Hebrews. The name given in that (language) is ‘Yeshua’. The final ‘a’ should be spelt without much emphasis. That only became ‘Joshua’ and ‘Jesus’ in the other European languages.

    It is quite common (in many languages) where the ‘ya’ becomes ‘ja’. Even in Vedas, what comes as ‘ya’ in other branches, comes as ‘ja’ in the Madhyantina branch of Sukla Yajur Veda, which is prevalent in North India. Yamuna is referred to as Jamuna. Yantram (machinery) is called as Jantar. In tamil, it is common to mention ‘ja’ of Sanskrit, as ‘ya’. Funnily, this is a converse to that! What is mentioned in Sanskrit as “Yamam’ is called as ‘Jamam’ in Tamizh. Why I mention this is because, the ‘ye’ in ‘Yeshua’ only has become ‘Je’ in ‘Jesus’. And that ‘Je’, we further change it to ‘Ye’ and call, slightly differently, as ‘Yesu’.

    It is felt that we can presume that the original ‘Yeshu’ is our ‘Esa’, that is, a name of Siva.

    If I say it that way, it is possible that some people in our own or in their religion could have a difference of opinion. After all, have I not been emphasizing on not having differences. Therefore, instead of saying, we can presume, I feel I will correct myself to say ‘May we presume’! To say ‘Jesus’ in ‘Jesus Christ’ as ‘Esan’ (one of Siva’s names).

    Let me come to ‘Christ’. It is entirely, a word originating from the European language. Don’t we perform special abhishekams (special bathing of the divine idols), as Pattabhishekam? By applying oil on the head and a holy bath (Mangala snanam). The same thing, applying oil as a religious ceremony, is prevalent in all the countries. There is no bath thereafter. It ends with only applying the oil. Since only a little is applied, it will get absorbed on its own. This (ritual) is called ‘anointment’. It is said that Eswara himself does anoint a few people in this manner, that is, perform Pattabhishekam, with a view to sending them as “messiah’ to elevate the world. The Hebrew, ‘Meshia’ became ‘Messiah’ in English. The equivalent to that in the European language of Greek is ‘Chris Tos’. Words like, ‘Christ’ in English have their roots only from that. People who believe that the person specially anointed by God and sent for the upliftment of the people and society, refers specifically to ‘Jesus’.

    It occurs to me as to why not show a link between ‘Christ’ and Krishna, just as shown for Jesus and Esa!
    Don’t we call Krishna as Kishtan, Kittan, Krittinan etc? In the same way, we can also say, ‘Kristen’. The ‘an’ in the end, is prevalent only in Tamizh. The Easwaran we call in Tamizh, is Eshwar for north Indians. Our Sankaran, Raman etc., are in the same way, Sankar and Ram. Nowadays, that has become a fashion here also. Let that be. If the ‘an’ is removed, what will happen to Krishnan, the Kristen. Would he not become ‘Krist’? In the same way as those linked to Siva becoming Saivam and those related to Vishnu, becoming Vaishnavam, does not what is related to ‘Krist’ become ‘Christ’?

    To sum up, ‘Jesus Christ’ = ‘Esa Krishnan’.

    (After himself laughing for a long time and making all who were with him, to laugh, Sri Charanar, continues).

    Thought, whether I could extend (the argument) of religious harmony, as in this way only, in the month which shows the non-difference between Siva and Vishnu, the person who is the reason for the Christmas festival, which occurs between the holy days belonging to the two, looks like, that with his very name, has adopted Siva, who is called as Eswara and also Krishna, the complete incarnation of Vishnu, without showing any difference between the two, is highlighting the lack of difference between Siva and Vishnu. Just told what occurred to me.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: